Skip to main content

Section 5.3 The adjoint map

The concept of adjoint map generalizes the matrix transposition or, equivalently, the pull-back of a 1-form.
Definition 5.3.1.
Let \(X, Y\) be Banach or Frechet spaces and let \(L:X\to Y\) be a linear map with a dense domain $D(J)$. We call adjoint of \(L\) the map \(L^*:Y^*\to X^*\) defined by
\begin{equation*} L^*\eta(x) = \eta(L(x)) \end{equation*}
In finite dimension, \(J\) is injective if and only if \(J^*\) is surjective. Indeed, set
\begin{equation*} \ker(J^*)^\perp = \{y\in Y\;|\;\eta(y)=0\text{ for all }\eta\in \ker(J^*)\} \subset Y \end{equation*}
and
\begin{equation*} \ker(J)^\perp = \{\xi\in X^*\;|\;\xi(x)=0\text{ for all }x\in\ker J\}\subset X^*. \end{equation*}
Then it is easy to verify that
\begin{equation*} J(X) = \ker(J^*)^\perp \end{equation*}
and
\begin{equation*} J^*(Y^*) = \ker(J)^\perp. \end{equation*}
Now, if \(J\) is surjective, then \(J(X)=Y\) and so every covector in \(\ker(J^*)\) is zero on each vector of \(Y\text{,}\) namely \(\ker(J^*)=\{0_Y\}\text{,}\) i.e. \(J^*\) is injective. Similarly, if \(J\) is injective, then \(\ker(J)=\{0_X\}\) and so \(J^*(Y^*) = \ker(J)^\perp=X^*\text{,}\) i.e. \(J^*\) is surjective. In particular, this shows that \(J\) is an isomorphism between \(X\) and \(Y\) if and only if \(J^*\) is an isomorphism between \(X^*\) and \(Y^*\text{.}\)

In infinite dimension, things are more subtle, for instance the image \(J(X)\) can be dense in \(Y\text{.}\)
(1) Assume first that \(y\in\ker(J^*)^\perp\text{,}\) namely that \(\eta(y) = 0\) for every \(\eta\in\ker J^*\text{.}\)
The following is a fundamental result by S. Banach and shows that, when the image is dense, things cannot go as in the finite-dimensional case. We do not include the proof because it is long. A complete proof appear in the textbook by Yosida.

Using the theorem above, it is easy to prove the following infinite-dimensional extension of the properties of the transposed of a matrix we saw above.
(1) Since
\begin{equation*} \|J^*_\eta\|_{X^*} = \sup_{\|x\|_X=1}|\eta(J(x))|\leq\|\eta\|_{Y^*}\cdot\|J\|_{op}, \end{equation*}
we have that
\begin{equation*} \|J^*\|_{op} = \sup_{\|eta\|_{Y^*}=1}\|J^*_\eta\|_{X^*}\leq\|J\|_{op}, \end{equation*}
so \(J^*\) is bounded -- in fact, as usual one can use the Hahn-Banach theorem to show that \(\|J^*\|_{op}=\|J\|_{op}\text{.}\)

(2) Assume first that \(J(X)=Y\text{.}\) Then, by (2) and (3) in Theorem 5.3.4, \(\ker(J^*)=\{0_{Y^*}\}\text{,}\) i.e. \(J^*\) is injective, and \(J^*(Y^*)\) is closed in \(X^*\text{.}\) Assume now that \(J^*\) is injective, so that \(\ker J^*=\{0_{Y^*}\}\text{,}\) and \(J^*(Y^*)\) is closed. Then, by (3) in Theorem 5.3.4, \(J(Y) = \ker(J^*)^\perp = X\text{.}\) (3) Similar to (2).
By the Hahn-Banach theorem, there is a non-zero \(\eta\in Y^*\) such that \(\ker\eta\supset\overline{J(X)}\text{.}\) Hence, \(J^*\eta(x) = \eta(J(x))=0\) for every \(x\in X\text{,}\) namely \(J^*_\eta=0_{X^*}\text{,}\) so \(J^*\) is not injective.
\(J^*\) is injective by the same argument used in Proposition 5.3.5. By [cross-reference to target(s) "t-kerperp" missing or not unique], the injectivity of \(J\) implies that the closure of \(J^*(Y^*)\) is the whole space \(X^*\text{.}\) Finally, if \(J^*(Y^*)=X^*\) then, by [cross-reference to target(s) "transpose" missing or not unique], also \(J\) is surjective.
We will meet several examples of these properties in next section.