Section 5.1 Bounded linear functionals
Remark 5.1.1.
In this chapter, we state claims in the setting of Frechet and Banach spaces and often we only provide proofs for the case of Banach spaces in order to avoid technicalities. Notice though that all statements, including the Hahn-Banach theorem, are actually valid in the much wider setting of Locally Convex (LC) spaces, namely spaces defined by families (not necessarily countable) of seminorms. The spaces \(L^p_c(\bR^n)\) (integrable functions with compact support), \(C^k_c(\bR^n)\) (\(C^k\) functions with compact support) and \(D^k(\bR^n)\) (see Section 5.5) are examples of spaces that are neither Banach nor Frechet but are LC. The same holds for weak and \(*\)-weak topologies.Definition 5.1.2.
Let \(X\) be a Frechet vector space. We set \(X^*=\cB(X,\bR)\) and we call this space the dual of \(X\text{.}\) In finite dimension, the elements of \(X^*\) are called covectors. In infinite dimension, they are also often called linear functionals.Example 5.1.3. Different behavior of vectors and covectors under changes of coordinates.
\begin{equation*}
\eps^i(e_j)=\delta^i_j
\end{equation*}
are clearly linearly independent and generate \(X^*\text{.}\) The map \(e_i\to\eps^i\text{,}\) though, is not canonical in the following sense. Let \(f=Ae\) be a second basis of \(X\text{,}\) namely \(A\) is a \(n\times n\) matrix and
\begin{equation*}
\begin{pmatrix}f_1\\ \vdots\\ f_n\\ \end{pmatrix} = A \begin{pmatrix}e_1\\ \vdots\\ e_n\\ \end{pmatrix}
\end{equation*}
and denote by \(\eta^i\) the dual basis of \(f_1,\dots,f_n\text{.}\) Then, since \(\eta(f)=\mathbb 1_n\text{,}\) \(\eps(e)=\mathbb 1_n\) and \(f=Ae\text{,}\) we see that \(\eta A=\eps\text{,}\) namely
\begin{equation*}
\eta = \eps A^{-1}.
\end{equation*}
On the other side, the map \(e_i\to\eps^i\) writes matricially as \(e\to e^T\text{,}\) and under \(f=Ae\) we have that
\begin{equation*}
f^T=e^T A^T.
\end{equation*}
So, when we change basis via \(A\text{,}\) the dual bases change with \(A^{-1}\) while the bases obtained via tha naif map \(e_i\to\eps^i\) changes with \(A^T\text{,}\) so this identification is not preseved in general. Notice, though, that this identification is preserved when one restricts to the class of matrices such that \(A^T=A^{-1}\text{.}\) These are called rotations and are the matrices that preserve the Euclidean scalar product. The fact that in this case the identification is canonical is reflected by the fact that it can it corresponds to the map \(e_i\to\langle e_i,\cdot\rangle\text{,}\) which is indeed preseved by isometries. This fact is at the core of the Riesz representation theorem in Hilbert spaces.