Skip to main content

Section 4.4 Three fundamental results on mappings

We borrow the Baire Category Theorem from topology to show the uniform boundedness principle for linear operators.

We need to show that, for any non-empty open set \(W\subset X\text{,}\) \(W\) has at least a point \(x\) in common with each of the \(U_n\text{.}\)

Denote by \(B_{x,r}\) the open ball with center \(x\) and radius \(r\text{.}\) Since \(U_1\) is dense, then there is a \(x_1\in W\cap U_1\text{.}\) Since \(U_1\) is open, there is a \(r_1>0\) such that
\begin{equation*} \overline{B_{x_1,r_1}}\subset W\cap U_1. \end{equation*}
By repeating this argument, we build sequences \(x_n,r_n\) such that
\begin{equation*} \overline{B_{x_n,r_n}}\subset B_{x_{n-1},r_{n-1}}\cap U_n. \end{equation*}
We can assume without loss of generality that \(r_n<1/n\text{.}\) The sequence \(x_n\) is Cauchy since \(x_n\in B_{x_m,r_m}\) for every \(n>m\text{,}\) so it converges to some \(x\in X\text{.}\) Necessarily, \(x\in \overline{B_{x_n,r_n}}\) for every \(n\) since these sets are all one inside the other. Hence, \(x\in W\cap U_1\cap U_2\cap\dots.\)

In other words, a countable collection of open dense sets has many common points.
An example for Baire's category theorem. Consider \(\bS^1=\RR (\text{ mod } 2\pi)\text{,}\) i.e. the interval \([0,2\pi)\) with its periodic extension. Then \(X\) is a complete metric space with the usual distance \(d(x,y)=|x-y|\text{.}\) Now, define the family of dense sets as
\begin{equation*} U_n = [0,2\pi)\backslash \left\{\frac{1}{n}\right\}. \end{equation*}
Then
\begin{equation*} \bigcap_n U_n = [0,2\pi)\backslash \left\{1,\frac{1}{2}, \frac{1}{3}, \dots \right\}, \end{equation*}
which is still dense in \(\bS^1\text{.}\)
The original Baire's Theorem was actually formulated for nowhere dense sets.

Define \(U_j=X\setminus \overline{F}_j\text{.}\) Then each \(U_j\) is open and dense. Indeed consider \(x\in X\text{.}\) If \(x\notin \overline{F}_j\) then \(x\in U_j\text{.}\) If \(x\in \overline{F}_j\) then there exists points in \(X\) that are arbitrary close. Hence \(U_j\) is dense in \(X\text{.}\) Then, by the Baire Category Theorem Theorem 4.4.1, \(\bigcap U_j\) is dense in \(X\) and
\begin{equation} \bigcap U_j =\bigcap X\setminus \overline{F}_j =X\setminus \bigcup \overline{F}_j.\tag{4.4.1} \end{equation}
Hence \(\bigcup \overline{F}_j \neq X\text{.}\)
After our excursion to topology, we come back to linear operators. As in the Bounded Operators section, we consider first the case of Banach spaces and we leave the discussion on Fréchet spaces to a subsection below.

We define closed sets \(F_j=\{x\in X: \|T x\|_Y\leq j \text{ for all } T\in \cS \}\text{.}\) Then by the above assumption, we have \(\bigcup_j F_j=X\text{.}\) By Corollary 4.4.3 at least one of the \(F_j\) must not be nowhere dense, i.e., it has non empty interior. We call this set \(F_n\) with
\begin{equation*} B_{y,r}\subset F_n. \end{equation*}
This means that \(y+x\in F_n \) for all \(\|x\|_X\leq r\text{,}\) so that
\begin{equation} \|Tx\|_Y=\|T(y+x)+T(-y)\| \leq n+ \|Ty\|_Y \leq R\tag{4.4.2} \end{equation}
for some \(R>0\text{.}\) Since all maps in \(\cS\) are linear, we can exploit the bound above as follows.

Let \(x\in X\text{.}\) Then
\begin{equation*} \|Tx\| = \frac{\|x\|}{r}\left\|T\left(r\frac{x}{\|x\|}\right)\right\| \leq \frac{\|x\|}{r} \frac{R}{r} \left\|r\frac{x}{\|x\|}\right\| =\frac{R}{r}\|x\|. \end{equation*}
Hence, we conclude that
\begin{equation*} \|T\|_{op}\leq \frac{R}{r} \end{equation*}
for all \(T\in\cS\text{.}\)

We need to prove that, for any \(r>0\) and \(x\in X\text{,}\) there are \(r'>0\) and \(y\in Y\) such that
\begin{equation*} B_{y,r'}\subset L(B_{x,r}). \end{equation*}
By linearity, it is enough to prove that there is a \(c>0\) such that
\begin{equation*} B_{0_Y,c}\subset L(B_{0_X,1}). \end{equation*}

Notice first that
\begin{equation*} \bigcup_{n=1}^\infty B_{0_X,n} = \bigcup_{n=1}^\infty nB_{0_X,1} = X, \end{equation*}
so that, since \(L\) is surjective,
\begin{equation*} \bigcup_{n=1}^\infty n\overline{L(B_{0_X,1})} = \bigcup_{n=1}^\infty \overline{L(nB_{0_X,1})} = L(X) = Y. \end{equation*}
Since \(Y\) is complete, by the Baire theorem, there must be a \(n_0\geq1\) such that \(n_0\overline{L(B_{0_X,1})}\text{,}\) and so \(\overline{L(B_{0_X,1})}\text{,}\) contains an open ball.

So, let \(c>0\) and \(y_0\in Y\) such that
\begin{equation*} B_{y_0,c}\subset\overline{L(B_{0_X,1})}. \end{equation*}
By symmetry, \(-y_0\in \overline{L(B_{0_X,1})}\text{,}\) so that
\begin{equation*} B_{y_0,4c}\subset\overline{L(B_{0_X,1})}+\overline{L(B_{0_X,1})}. \end{equation*}
By the triangle inequality, balls in a Banach space are convex and so
\begin{equation*} \overline{L(B_{0_X,1})}+\overline{L(B_{0_X,1})}\subset\overline{L(B_{0_X,2})}. \end{equation*}
Hence, by linearity,
\begin{equation*} B_{0_Y,2c}\subset\overline{L(B_{0_X,1})} \end{equation*}
or, equivalently,
\begin{equation*} B_{0_Y,c}\subset\overline{L(B_{0_X,\frac{1}{2}})} \end{equation*}
This means that, for every \(\eps>0\) and \(y\in Y\) with \(\|y\|< c\text{,}\) there is a \(x\) with \(\|x\|<1/2\) such that
\begin{equation*} \|y-Tx\|_Y<\eps. \end{equation*}
In particular, there is a \(z_1\in B_{0_X,\frac{1}{2}}\) such that \(\|y-Tz_1\|_Y<c/2\text{.}\)

Similarly, there is a \(z_2\in B_{0_X,\frac{1}{4}}\) such that \(\|(y-Tz_1)-Tz_2\|_Y<c/4\text{.}\)

Proceeding by induction, we build a sequence \(z_n\) with \(z_n\in B_{0_X,\frac{1}{2^n}}\) and \(\|y-T(z_1+\dots+z_n)\|_Y<c/2^n\text{.}\)

It follows that the sequence \(x_n=z_1+\dots+z_n\) is Cauchy and so converges to some \(x\in X\text{.}\) Moreover,
\begin{equation*} \|x\|=\|\sum_{n=1}^\infty x_n\|\leq\sum_{n=1}^\infty\|x_n\|<\sum_{n=1}^\infty2^{-n}=1 \end{equation*}
and, by construction,
\begin{equation*} Lx=\lim Lx_n=y. \end{equation*}
Hence,
\begin{equation*} B_{0_Y,c}\subset L(B_{0_X,1}) \end{equation*}
Consider the first derivative operator
\begin{equation*} \frac{d}{dx}:C^1([0,1])\to C^0([0,1]). \end{equation*}
It is continuous and surjective, so it is an open map.

In general, being an open map has important consequences on the existence of solutions of an equation of the type
\begin{equation*} Tx=y. \end{equation*}
Assume that the equation is solvable, namely that \(y\) is in the range of \(L\text{.}\) Then, the fact that \(L\) is an open map grants the solvability of \(Tx=y'\) for every \(y'\) close enough to \(y\text{.}\)

The identity map \(id:(X,\|\cdot\|_2)\to(X,\|\cdot\|_1)\) is a bijection and it is bounded, since by hypothesis \(\|id(x)\|_1=\|x\|_1\leq c\|x\|_2\) for all \(x\in X\text{.}\) Hence, it has a bounded inverse.

(\(\implies\)) Assume that \(\Gamma_L\) is closed and set \(\|x\|_1=\|x\|_X\) and \(\|x\|_2=\|x\|_X+\|Lx\|_Y\text{.}\) Then \((X,\|\cdot\|_2)\) is a Banach space. Indeed, let \(x_n\) be cauchy under \(\|\cdot\|_2\text{.}\) Then \(x_n\) is Cauchy under \(\|\cdot\|_X\) and \(Lx_n\) is Cauchy under \(\|\cdot\|_Y\text{,}\) namely there are \(x\in X\) and \(y\in Y\) such that \(x_n\to x\) in \((X,\|\cdot\|_X)\) and \(Lx_n\to y\) in \((Y,\|\cdot\|_Y)\text{.}\) Since \(\Gamma_L\) is closed, \(y=Lx\text{,}\) so that
\begin{equation*} \|x_n-x\|_2\to0. \end{equation*}
By the Lemma above, \(\|\cdot\|_1\) and \(\|\cdot\|_2\) are equivalent, so that
\begin{equation*} \|Lx\|_Y = \|x\|_2 - \|x\|_1 \leq \|x\|_2 \leq c\|x\|_1 = c\|x\|_X, \end{equation*}
namely \(L\) is bounded.

(\(\Leftarrow\)) Assume that \(L\) is bounded and let \((x_n,Lx_n)\to(x,y)\) a converging sequence in the graph. Then, by the continnuity of \(L\text{,}\) \(Lx_n\to Lx\text{.}\) Hence, \(y=Lx\) and so the graph is closed.

Subsection 4.4.1 Fréchet spaces versions

Set
\begin{equation*} U_m = \left\{x\in X\,:\,\sup_{T\in\cF} q_k(Tx)<m\right\}. \end{equation*}
By hypothesis, each of those sup is finite and therefore
\begin{equation*} \Cup_{i=1}^\infty U_m = X. \end{equation*}
By Baire's theorem, there must be a \(U_{m_0}\) that contains some ball \(B_{x_0,r}\text{.}\) Hence, for some \(\eps>0\text{,}\) \(U_{m_0}\) contains some "seminorm tube" \(x_0+\{x\in X\,:\,p_n(x)<\eps\}\text{,}\) namely
\begin{equation*} x_0 + x \in U_m\;\implies\;\sup_{T\in\cF} q_k(T(x_0+x))<m. \end{equation*}
Using linearity and the triangular inequality we find ultimately that there is some \(M>0\) such that
\begin{equation*} p_n(x) < \eps \; \implies \; \sup_{T\in\cF} q_k(T(x))<M. \end{equation*}
Using the same arguments in Proposition 4.2.14, we get the equicontinuity.

TBA
Consider the first derivative operator
\begin{equation*} \frac{d}{dx}:C^\infty([0,1])\to C^\infty([0,1]). \end{equation*}
It is not surjective because the derivative of all constant functions is zero. Now, set \(A=\{f\in C^\infty([0,1])\,:\,f(0)=0\}\) and denote by \(A\) the restriction of \(d/dx\) to \(A\text{.}\) Then \(A\) is continuous and surjective and so it is an open map.

TBA
Consider the first derivative operator
\begin{equation*} \frac{d}{dx}:C^\infty([0,1])\to C^\infty([0,1]). \end{equation*}
It is continuous and surjective, so it is an open map.